Thursday, November 14, 2019
Essay --
The Protestant Reformation and Its Impact on European Society Martin Luther was born in 1483 in Eiselben, Germany. He originally intended to pursue a career in law, but changed his path to theology after surviving a dangerous lightning storm. As a monk, he wrestled with his conflicting views in faith. During his time in an Augustinian monastery, he began to develop a belief that God was cruel for requiring him to devote so much effort into living a pious life. Luther soon began to believe that God was directly connected with people and that actions did not lead to salvation. During his lifetime, a philosophy known as Renaissance Humanism had been developing. It called for researching the original sources of records as well as empowering all humans. He established his theological beliefs by studying the Bible directly instead of following Catholic tradition. The act of going back to the source of information was part of Humanist philosophy. Luther then translated the source of The Bible into vernacular, which went along with another Humanist ide a of educating the common person. Luther became a professor in Wittenberg, Germany in 1508. There he attempted to institute Humanist philosophy as the basis of academics instead of the Medieval Scholasticism, which was the established teaching style of the time. Scholasticism was set up by the Church as a teaching style for Universities around 400 years prior and eventually became an attempt to reconcile Christian doctrine and ancient Greek philosophy. Luther ultimately became critical of many of the traditions in the Church and his objections spread throughout Europe, starting with his 95 Theses in 1517. Although he originally was only interested in intellectual discussion, Luther became ... ...he Anabaptists represented a more extreme side of the Reformation. Among their views were adult baptism and separation of church and state. The Anabaptists were persecuted by both Catholics and other Protestants, though they survived in Northern Germany and the Netherlands. These many divisions in Christianity likely would not have formed if Luther did not raise his questions against the Church. Science in Europe could develop more easily as people were not as restricted by the Churchââ¬â¢s authority. The Catholic Church was not against science, but it had adopted old Greek methods, which were reconciled with Christianity by Aquinas, to become the accepted philosophy of the Church. This paradigm was part of the traditional Scholasticism method of critical thought and, because it was the established teaching and learning style of the Church, few desired to go against it.
Monday, November 11, 2019
Applying Economics To Current Events
There are so many events going on in the world today. There is a housing market issue, health care reform issue, and companies fighting for paid sick leave from their jobs. There are many more this is just to name a few. The housing market is going to start booming again for a short time. The health care reform created by Obama will continue to be an issue for a long time, and companies are fighting to get paid sick leave when they are ill. There are so many things that have changed in the world, and it sure is not what it used to be. First, the housing market is starting to come back to business, but it is taking some time. ââ¬Å"Between 2002 and 2007, the population of prospective homeowners grew at an average annual rate of 2. 5 million. Over this same time period, the number of households increased by average of 1. 1 million. And to accommodate these newly formed households, homebuilders built an average of 1. 7 million housing units a yearâ⬠(Maxfield, 2013). That is great for some people. When the United States was in the recession, there were many of people that lost almost everything that they owned. Anyone that is looking to buying a home, or having one built should take careful planning before doing so. People should consider that the United States could go into another recession at any time. Is the person going to be able to afford their home? That is the number one question a person should ask themselves. There are many people that try to live outside of their means. Sure it is nice if the person has a good job that is secure. Most jobs are not securing anymore, especially health care. The health care reform has everyone up in a roar. Some people agree with the reform and others do not. Something has been pulled out of the Affordable Care Act and, ââ¬Å"It gives states just enough power over insurance marketplaces and the Medicaid expansion to continue the unequal and unfair distribution of state-based social services. It allows states to eviscerate Medicaid in ways that don't make senseâ⬠(Vox, 2013). The states are still going to have control over everything and even more now. ââ¬Å"In some states, Medicaid pays to save the life of a stroke victim in the hospital, but then denies adequate ehabilitation services and devices to prevent that person's ongoing health problems from rapidly placing further strain on the thin social-service safety netâ⬠(Vox,2013). Medicaid used to cover everything that a patient would need. There should not be a change in that. There are some people that cannot afford health care coverage on their own. If a person has a job and the company offers insurance, then yes a person should take it. The people that take advantage of the system and does not take the offered insurance and stays on Medicaid should be fined. Employers are going to have to start paying for their employees to have insurance. The company must have at least 50 full-time employees to start the mandatory coverage. When a company does not provide the coverage, the company will get fined between $2000. 00 and $3000. 00. There are many of companies that do not have that many employees. What are going to happen to all of the small businesses? Are they going to get shut down? Are they going to get a fine for not having some type of insurance coverage for the employees? There are still un-answered questions and there are people wondering what is going to their jobs when the Affordable Care Act goes into full effect. There are also companies that do not offer paid sick leave. There are many states that have already got the law passed that it is mandatory for employers to offer paid sick leave. There may be some people that would abuse the privilege of having this, and not wanting to offer it. There are still honest people in the world that it could be an advantage to. Many people have families and cannot afford to call-in sick when they have the flu, or another illness. That is where the paid sick leave would come in. Employees coming to work sick could be a bigger risk then not letting them have to day off. It could be difficult for some smaller businesses to offer this because of the costs. The restaurant industry could get hit pretty hard because of the administrative costs as well as having to cover peoplesââ¬â¢ shifts that are unable to go to work. ââ¬Å"The U. S is the only major industrialized nation without a national paid sick-leave policy Some 145 countries provide paid sick days for short- or long-term illnesses. Japan, the Netherlands, Switzerland, Sweden, Denmark, Finland and Singapore require employers to provide at least 10 paid sick daysâ⬠(Koba, 2013). In Conclusion, the world is not what it used to be. The government is eventually going to control the whole world and nobody will have a say on anything. The housing market is slowly coming back up, but are the people going to be able to get a new home and afford it later down the line? The United States is not promising that it will not get back into another recession so the person better only hope that they have a safe, secure job. The Affordable Care Act will be completely controlled by the government, and Medicaid patients will not have the coverage they once had. Companies do not offer paid sick leave to the employees, but some states are trying to make it a law.
Saturday, November 9, 2019
Is The British Appeasement In 1930s Defensible History Essay
The calming in 1930s is delivered by British Prime Minister Neville Chamberlain, to construct up a permanent peace in Europe every bit good as to avoid the war against Nazi Germany. Chamberlain created calming policy based on three aims: ââ¬Å" â⬠¦ foremost, to debar the danger of war, 2nd, to make conditions in which dialogues can take topographic point and, 3rd, to convey about the success of those dialogues so that they many strengthen corporate security, farther Germany ââ¬Ës return to the League and, in a happier atmosphere, allow those larger dialogues on economic affairs and on affairs of statements to take topographic point â⬠1 However, the eruption of war that followed, proved that the policy has clearly failed and it is besides still argued as the one of chief grounds to break out World War II. This essay will discourse about the cause of the debut of calming and why it is untenable in international dealingss. After World War I, the Great Depression that followed forced totalitarian governments to emerge around Europe, such as Fascism in Italy, Socialism in Soviet Union and Nazism in Germany. In Germany, it was Hitler who followed a totalitarian province and pursued a revisionist foreign policy after he became a Chancellor of the Exchequer in January 1933. While UK and France were seeking to avoid a war and heal from the great depression caused by World War I, Hitler strongly believed that another war was needed to break-out from poorness every bit good as ââ¬ËVersailles ââ¬Ë . Hitler hence started to denounce ââ¬ËVersailles ââ¬Ë from March 1935 by re-introducing mandatory muster. However, UK and France have merely issued formal protests in response, which concluded with weakening of ââ¬ËVersailles System ââ¬Ë in favor of Germany, due to the fright of war. While the procedure of calming was detaining any clear reply, Italy has invaded Abyssinia. This provided Hitler with clip and chance to beef up and remilitarize Rhineland while UK and France dealt with Italy. France was entitled to reoccupy Rhineland, but France did non desire to move unless UK acted. UK did non desire to step in as they thought remilitarization was non a ââ¬Ëflagrant ââ¬Ë misdemeanor. Neither UK nor France wanted to take serious duty that had any opportunity of get downing another war. Munich, 29th September 1938 was the flood tide of this failure of calming. Hitler demanded return of Sudeten. UK sought to intercede, and the parts of Sudeten with German bulk transferred to the custodies of Germany. In late September Hitler raised his bets, demanding immediate transportation of whole Sudeten to Germany. Chamberlain and Daladier accepted Italian In March 1939. Furthermore, Hitler invaded Czech states of Bohemia and Moravia. Neither France nor UK confronted Hitler 1 Anthony Eden in the House of Commons, March 26 1936. The ground UK supported calming is that the populace was non ready for war and UK was still retrieving from the 1929 crisis. Besides, France was unwilling to confront Hitler without UK ââ¬Ës support. They merely wanted to get away from war and understate their duty as they sought strong support of another state. This development of calming shows the unorganized allied European states which ne'er meet with clear understanding to compact the menace German forces possessed, and the confusion that was brought with the construct of calming gave opportunity for Germany to turn without any lucifer for to a great extent armed European allied forces e?â⬠¦ie ie?Ãâ i ?ie eà ©Ãâ eà ¦Ã ¬ e-?i-?i ?iz?e ieà µÃ i?Ãâ i?Ãâ e?â⬠iiâ⠢â⬠iâ⬠¢? i â⬠¢ià ±Ã¢â¬ ¦i?ââ¬Å¾ , eà °?e?Ãâ e e?â⬠¦ie eà °Ãâ ee? iià °?e?Ãâ i ââ¬Å¾ ià µ?e?Ãâ i iâ⬠?iâ⬠¢?eà µÃ ii-?e iâ⬠ââ¬Å¾ezââ¬ËiSà ¤i eà °Ã¢â¬ ¢eià ±Ã¢â¬ ¦i iââ¬Å¾?e i-?e?â⬠¹eââ¬Å¡?eà ©?iââ¬Å¾? ei ?ià §Ãâ eà ·?iâ⬠¢? policyeà °Ãâ continuee?à ©eâ⬠¹?eâ⬠¹Ã ¤ . Trying to chance of war or whether Britain and France would hold been better off traveling to war earlier instead than subsequently, loss could be less. The confusion and struggle bought clip for Germany . If the calming was scrapped and the western European states pressured the turning Germany so the face of European history may hold been changed because of the fact that Germany already lost the First World War was besides needed to be considered. ià ¦Ã¢â¬ ° , ieà µÃ e iâ⬠ââ¬Å¾ezââ¬ËiSà ¤eà °Ãâ eââ¬Å¡?i e?â⬠¦ii-? i? iâ⠢â⬠i â⬠¢ià ±Ã¢â¬ ¦i?ââ¬Å¾ iZ?e? eââ¬Å¡?i e?â⬠¦ii i?à ¤iSà ¤iS?eà ¦Ã ¬iâ⬠¢Ã¢â¬Å¾/ii?â⬠i ?e ?i?ââ¬Å¾ eà ¬Ã µiiâ⬠¢?iz? iâ⬠?e ?i?Ãâ ie iz?eii eà µÃ eà °Ãâ i ieà µÃ /iâ⬠ââ¬Å¾ezââ¬ËiSà ¤iâ⠢Ãâ eââ¬Å¡?i e?â⬠¦ieà °Ã¢â¬Å¾ e?à µee eà °Ã¢â¬Å¾iiâ⬠¢?e? eââ¬Å¡?i e?â⬠¦ii?ââ¬Å¾ e?à ¬i ?iâ⬠¢?e?à °eeâ⬠¹Ã ¤ eââ¬Å¡?i e?â⬠¦iei i ââ¬Å¾iY?i?ââ¬Å¾ iâ⬠?iâ⬠¢?e à ¤ eââ¬Å"à eâ⬠¹?eâ⬠¹Ã ¤ . eà ·?eà ¦Ã ¬e? , eââ¬Å¡?i e?â⬠¦ii?Ãâ ieà µÃ /iâ⬠ââ¬Å¾ezââ¬ËiSà ¤iâ⠢Ãâ iâ⬠?e ?eà °Ã¢â¬Å¾ e?à µi?à °i-? ei eà °Ãâ iz? e?â⬠¦ii i ââ¬Å¾iâ⬠à µi ?i eà µÃ °iââ¬Å¡Ã ¬i ? ià ·?iâ⬠¢?iââ¬Å¾Ã ± , ià ¦Ã¢â¬ ° i? iââ¬Å¡Ã ¬iâ⬠¹? e?â⠢iââ¬Å¾? i-ââ¬Ëeà ©? i ââ¬Å¾iY?i?ââ¬Å¾ ieYà ¬iâ⬠¢? iâ⬠¢?eSâ⬠e à ¶Ãâ eâ⬠¹?i?ââ¬Å¾ ee ee? iezÃâ eââ¬Å"?e eà µÃ °iââ¬Å¡Ã ¬e ?ie ie?à µiâ⬠¢?eà ©?iââ¬Å¾? 2ià °? iââ¬Å¾?e?ââ¬Å¾e?Ãâ i ââ¬Å¾i ei-?ià §Ã¢â¬Ëeâ⬠¹?eâ⬠¹Ã ¤ . UK and France lost credibleness because UK and France did non maintain their committedness. They warned Hitler that if he attacked Poland, they would declare war on Germany. By this clip, nevertheless, Hitler no longer believed their menaces. If an adversary issues a menace that it has the power to transport out, and an involvement in making so, the menace will be believed, even if that state has bluffed in the past. But if it makes a menace that it lacks the power to transport out, or has no involvement in making so, the credibleness of that menace will be viewed with great incredulity. Chamberlain believed he could negociate enduring peace with Hitler. It was based on a naA?ve apprehension of Hitler ââ¬Ës purposes or on desirous believing about the possibility of set uping a permanent peace with Germany, nor was it an alternate to equilibrating. It was misdirecting policy based on underestimate, and misconstruing that Chamberlain trusted Hitler. The opinion was really emotionally based and this was a error as the remainder of European states readily figured out that Hitler was fixing military invasions over Poland. The calming was hence invalid and forced remainder of European allied forces to confront huge grown and good trained German Armies. calming have to be used under imaginable set of circumstances.Churchill, the ultimate anti-appeaser, presented a more nuanced image: ââ¬Å" Appeasement in itself may be good or bad harmonizing to the fortunes. Winston Churchill ridiculed calming as akin to ââ¬Å" one who feeds a crocodile, trusting it will eat him last â⬠Particularly, Adolf Hitler revealed his desire publically to occupy Europe in his life, My Struggle The primary purpose of calming was to extinguish the danger of a European war, but accordingly it endanger Europe as it gave chance Germany, geographical and clip loose credibleness. The grants over German rearmament, the Rhineland, Austria, and Sudeten Czechoslovakia non merely failed to pacify Hitler, but made war even more likely by quickening his appetency for aggression and by sabotaging the credibleness of Britain and France and the public-service corporation of their subsequent warrant of Poland. Many critics of appeasement contend that a more confrontational scheme of rearmament and reconciliation might hold avoided war, either by discouraging Hitler or by exposing his foolhardiness and thereby triping his overthrow by the more cautious German military and its internal Alliess.
Thursday, November 7, 2019
Mexico Essays - Valley Of Mexico, Americas, History Of North America
Mexico Essays - Valley Of Mexico, Americas, History Of North America Mexico The Aztecs The Aztecs were the native American people who dominated northern Mxico at the time of the Spanish conquest led by Hernan Cortes in the early 16th century. According to their own legends, they originated from a place called Aztlan, somewhere in north or northwest Mexico. At that time the Aztecs (who referred to themselves as the Mexica or Tenochca) were a small, nomadic, Nahuatl-speaking aggregation of tribal peoples living on the margins of civilized Mesoamerica. In the 12th century they embarked on a period of wandering and in the 13th century settled in the central basin of Mxico. Continually dislodged by the small city-states that fought one another in shifting alliances, the Aztecs finally found refuge on small islands in Lake Texcoco where, in 1325, they founded the town of TENOCHTITLAN (modern-day Mexico City). The term Aztec, originally associated with the migrant Mexico, is today a collective term, applied to all the peoples linked by trade, custom, religion, and language to these founders. Fearless warriors and pragmatic builders, the Aztecs created an empire during the 15th century that was surpassed in size in the Americas only by that of the Incas in Peru. As early texts and modern archaeology continue to reveal, beyond their conquests and many of their religious practices, there were many positive achievements: the formation of a highly specialized and stratified society and an imperial administration the expansion of a trading network as well as a tribute system the development and maintenance of a sophisticated agricultural economy, carefully adjusted to the land the cultivation of an intellectual and religious outlook that held society to be an integral part of the cosmos. The yearly round of rites and ceremonies in the cities of Tenochtitlan and neighboring Tetzcoco, and their symbolic art and architecture, gave expression to an ancient awareness of the interdependence of nature and humanity. The Aztecs remain the most extensively documented of all Amerindian civilizations at the time of European contact in the 16th century. Spanish friars, soldiers, and historians and scholars of Indian or mixed descent left invaluable records of all aspects of life. These ethnohistoric sources, linked to modern archaeological inquiries and studies of ethnologists, linguists, historians, and art historians, portray the formation and flourishing of a complex imperial state.
Tuesday, November 5, 2019
14 College Memes That Will Make You Laugh Through Tears
14 College Memes That Will Make You Laugh Through Tears Studying in college is something you can cry or laugh about. However, its better to choose the latter. Though college life can be really challenging at times, good sense of humor will defenitely help you to go through this difficult and yet amazing period of your life. Social media communities are full of funny memes created by college and high school students just like you. Some of them we previously published on our Facebook page. Heres the list of the most popular and hilarious memes about college life and challenges that our Facebook audience have found the most attractive. #1 #2 #3 #4 #5 #6 #7 #8 #9 #10 #11 #12 #13 #14 P.S. If youd like to see more fun memes about college and high school, just click any of the listed images and visit our Facebook page. Well be glad to get more likes from you ðŸâ¢â Cover image credit: Warner Bros. Entertainment Inc.
Saturday, November 2, 2019
2010 health care reform law Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 250 words
2010 health care reform law - Essay Example Without being included in the exception, an individual that must be under coverage and remains without health insurance, faces the fine of $95 per adult and $47.50 per child (up to $285 per family) or 1.0% of the family income, whichever is greaterâ⬠for this year and the fine increases annually (Kaiser Family Foundation, 2014). This reiterates that information must be further disseminated and the need to encourage individual participation. The cooperation of employers is also an important aspect in the success of the program. They must be re-oriented of the policies contained in the law to aid them in choosing the best health insurance policy to implement. The dilemma of small employers and of those self-employed in higher income brackets who often wish to ignore it due to the financial burden it inflicts must be addressed. The tax credit system and the exchanges, federal or not, provide for choices that should keep them on track (Klein, 2012). Kaiser Family Foundation. (2014). The requirement to buy coverage under the Affordable Care Act. Retrieved from http://kff.org/infographic/the-requirement-to-buy-coverage-under-the-affordable-care-act/ Klein, K.E. (2012, Oct. 4). What Obamacare means for small employers in 2013. Businessweek. Retrieved from
Thursday, October 31, 2019
Media Smart Quiz Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 250 words
Media Smart Quiz - Essay Example Rappers singing about killing cops make individuals think that all rappers want or have killed cops. c. Audiences negotiation their own meaning: Audiences judge media literacy differently. A white male might think that all the aid to Haiti is wasted because he does not have a job in the slow economy. However a Haitian woman living in the United States might think help should have been provided before the earthquake. d. Media constructions have commercial purposes: Media construction can revolve around a product. An example might be a newscast having a sponsor provides coffee mugs with their logos prominently displayed toward the camera. e. Media messages contain values and ideologies: Values and ideologies are contained in every media message depending on the outlet. Examples would be Fox News promotes a prolife agenda, whereas other networks are prochoice. These two messages promote the values and ideologies inherent in American society today. f. Media messages have social and political consequences: The social and political consequences of media messages are seen daily. Social issues like smoking is discouraged in ads from truth.com and political pundits on both sides give their spin on issues daily. Each story or message can influence citizens about social policy or politics. g. Each medium has its own unique aesthetic form/impact: Pictures and other media messages are presented in different mediums. Black and white, color, sepia, still picture, video, and so forth all have unique mediums. A video on a plasma television of a real battle scene would more graphic than the same scene on an old black and white set. However when portraying WWI or WWII, it seems more realistic to view black and white footage. This is how the audience learned this material so black and white is more creditable. The same goes for Vietnam and the Gulf Wars except theses wars are more credible in color. Mass communication grew during the industrial age due to
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)